(The following is a comment I received on a previous blog post, What Therapist Qualities or Experiences Have Been Helpful? The poster is "anonymous" but I still requested permission to reprint his/her comment here. I found it to be incredibly insightful and an important read for us therapists to remember what the client needs from us in therapy. We all can benefit from remembering these points.)
Here are some crucial qualities of a therapist from a client's point of view.
a. That the therapist pays attention to the client's plan for therapy, as opposed to what the therapist decides the plan should be. Most people come into private practice therapy already motivated. They have at least an unconscious idea, and usually a conscious one, of what they want to work on with us. I certainly did when I was in therapy! I wanted the therapist to stay focused on my plan.
b. Know the difference between empathy and sympathy. Empathy is feeling the client's world. Sympathy is expressing your feelings about it. I think clients in general want big doses of empathy and small doses of sympathy.
c. Understanding is much more important than "caring." Many merely neurotic (as opposed to e.g. pathological) people coming into therapy -- I was one of these, too -- have a social world of people who care. What they don't have is a worldful of people who are trained to understand. If one needs to err on this balance, this former client would take understanding over "caring" any day. Understanding makes the therapist a valued professional. Caring makes him or her a paid friend. My therapist struggled a little with this distinction before he got it. When he got it, the therapy got hugely more valuable for me.
d. Understand first. Then, seek to be understood. My therapist used to always says, "Let me make sure I understand what you're saying before I even think about responding. You're saying that...." This was the BEST phrasing in the universe, because often he was 85% or 90% there, and I could clarify the last ten or fifteen percent. It meant we were walking the same turf. I was grateful for this. It shortened the process and made it more valuable.
e. A therapist who remembers that "the client is not their problem, and the problem is not the client" is doing the client a real service. I always had the nagging sense in therapy that the therapist was lacking a sense of who I really was, apart from whatever my presenting problem happened to be. Yes, it's true that in therapy we're there to talk about big issues and big concerns. But our lives outside the room are so much more than that, and the therapist who explores and understands the whole range of our lives -- our work, our play, our love, our being part of a larger community, our literary tastes, our good experiences as well as our painful ones -- will be a more effective therapist for us. We clients have problems, just as therapists have problems. But neither the therapist nor the client "is" their problem.
Similarly, the problem is not the client. Yes, a client may have some pathogenic belief(s) or maladaptive patterns. But they're far more than that, too. They might be essentially good people with those beliefs or even because of those beliefs. It might even be that those beliefs contribute or underscore their being good people in the world, even though the beliefs might not be so comfortable for the client.
The more the therapist was able to grasp me as a whole person, the better the therapy was. And the more the therapist was able to underscore and strengthen the good, as well as try to repair the pathogenic, the better the therapy was. Sounds simple, no? If it was that simple, and more therapists could execute it effectively, a lot fewer people would be abandoning therapy.
------------------------------------------------------------
This is great stuff. Any therapists have comments on it?
A Therapist Must-Read - From a Client's Mouth to Our Ears
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





3 comments:
Wow. Double wow. Triple wow. This needs to be in Psychology Today and one or more of the American Psychological Association journals. Preferably at the same time!
"Triple wow" is right. It's right on the money - and very well written. I told the poster I'd like to do something with it in an article as well as posting the thread on this blog. This is the kind of thing people in our profession need to see - and take good note of. I'll get to work on it...
As a therapist, two things struck me about this remarkable listing.
First, the notion that "understanding is more important than caring" is right on. I think a lot of us have a tendency to turn into caring machines, pumping out sympathy and and care when what our clients need is understanding they can't reach on their own; caring that leads to meaningful change for them.
Second, I was reminded that pathogenic beliefs or maladaptive patterns may actually not be so pathogenic or maladaptive, when they lead to goodness. Our society is so me-oriented, and me-comfort-oriented, that no one really talks about goodness anymore. Which is too bad, I think, because maybe the pathogenic or maladaptive might actually be healthful or pro-social when looked at from a belief system that values goodness over comfort.
I guess if I wanted to instill a value to strive for in my children, it would be goodness, not comfort.
Post a Comment